Cycle Threshold Probability Score for Immediate and Sensitive Detection of B.1.351 SARS-CoV-2 Lineage.

BACKGROUND: Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern associated with immune escape is important to safeguard vaccination efficacy. We describe the potential of delayed N gene amplification in the Allplex SARS-CoV-2 Assay (Seegene) for screening of the B.1.351 (20H/501.V2, variant of concern 2 [VOC.V2], South African SARS-CoV-2 variant) lineage. METHODS: In a study cohort of 397 consecutive polymerase chain reaction-positive samples genotyped by whole-genome sequencing, amplification curves of E/N/S-RdRP targets indicated delayedN vs E gene amplification characteristic of B.1.351. Logistic regression was used to calculate a VOC.V2 probability score that was evaluated as a separate screening test in an independent validation cohort vs sequencing. RESULTS: B.1.351 showed a proportionally delayed amplification of the  N vs E gene. In logistic regression, only N and E gene cycle thresholds independently contributed to B.1.351 prediction, allowing calculation of a VOC.V2 probability score with an area under the curve of 0.94. At an optimal dichotomous cutoff point of 0.12, the VOC.V2 probability score achieved 98.7% sensitivity at 79.9% specificity, resulting in a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.6% and a positive predictive value of 54.6%. The probability of B.1.351 increased with an increasing VOC.V2 probability score, achieving a likelihood ratio of 12.01 above 0.5. A near-maximal NPV was confirmed in 153 consecutive validation samples. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed N vs E gene amplification in the Allplex SARS-CoV-2 Assay can be used for fast and highly sensitive screening of B.1.351.

Performance Evaluation of the Siemens SARS-CoV-2 Total Antibody and IgG Antibody Test.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, the performance of 2 commercially available SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays is evaluated. METHODS: The Siemens SARS-CoV-2 Total (COV2T) and IgG (COV2G) antibody tests were evaluated on a Siemens Atellica IM1300 analyzer. Imprecision was assessed with the CLSI EP15 protocol using positive controls. Ninety control group specimens were analyzed for specificity, and 175 specimens from 58 patients with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 were measured for the sensitivity and kinetics of the antibody response. RESULTS: Within-run and total imprecision were acceptable for both assays. Both tests showed a specificity of 100%. Sensitivity earlier in the disease state was greater for the COV2T assay than for the COV2G assay, but sensitivity >14 days after onset of symptoms approached 100% for both. For all patients, antibody titers remained above the seroconversion cutoff for all follow-up specimens. CONCLUSION: This study shows acceptable performance for both the Siemens COV2T and COV2G test, although seroconversion occurs earlier with the COV2T test.